cover

Fine-tuned GPT-3.5 Performance: Praise Component Identification Results

31 May 2025

Detailed results of fine-tuned GPT-3.5 models showing mean, std, min, and max M-IoU scores for identifying effort- and outcome-based praise

cover

Correlation of M-IoU with Human Judgments for Outcome-Based Praise

31 May 2025

This scatter matrix visualizes the strong positive correlation between M-IoU scores and human coder ratings for outcome-based praise in automated feedback

cover

Input Format for Fine-tuning GPT-3.5 for Praise Evaluation

31 May 2025

Explore the structured input format sed to fine-tune GPT-3.5 models for identifying effort- and outcome-based praise in tutor responses via JSON output.

cover

Lesson Principles: Defining Effective Praise in Tutoring

31 May 2025

Explore the core principles defining effective praise for student motivation, including sincerity, specificity, and focus on the learning process

cover

Cited Works: AI in Education, Natural Language Processing, and Tutoring Research

31 May 2025

A list of academic references at the intersection of artificial intelligence in education and natural language processing techniques

cover

Acknowledgments: Funding and Support for Explanatory Feedback Research

30 May 2025

Acknowledging the funding bodies and individuals who supported the research on automated explanatory feedback using GPT models.

cover

Conclusion: GPT Models for Automated Explanatory Feedback

29 May 2025

We conclude our study on enhancing automated feedback systems using GPT models, demonstrating the effectiveness of prompting and fine-tuning for tutor training.

cover

Discussing GPT Models for Automated Explanatory Feedback in Tutor Training

29 May 2025

Our discussion covers GPT's role in delivering automated explanatory feedback for tutors, comparing prompting and fine-tuning approaches,

cover

GPT Prompting Performance: Explanatory Feedback for Tutor Praise

28 May 2025

We evaluate GPT-3.5 and GPT-4's performance in identifying praise components via prompting, revealing M-IoU scores and human satisfaction levels